Current data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics reveals a stark contrast between the high demand for talent and the under-utilisation of neurodivergent workers. With 3.2% of job vacancies unfilled and 28% of businesses reporting ongoing vacancies, it is perplexing that Australia ranks among the lowest in the OECD for disability employment. This discrepancy highlights a significant missed opportunity for businesses to leverage the potential of neurodiversity at work.

The Role of Neurodiversity in Addressing Workforce Shortages

In today’s competitive job market, the recruitment and retention of neurodivergent employees offer significant advantages. Employers who prioritize neurodiversity at work consistently report improved productivity, workplace culture, and safety. Research by Austin and Pisano (2017) highlights that neurodivergent workers, including those with ADHD, Autism, and Dyslexia, bring unique problem-solving skills and innovative thinking, which can enhance operational efficiency and overall satisfaction.
In Australia, companies like Telstra have seen tangible benefits from their neurodiversity programs, including higher retention rates and increased employee engagement. Telstra’s experience illustrates that neurodivergent workers contribute fresh perspectives to problem-solving tasks and team dynamics, which are vital in today’s ever-changing business landscape.

The Australian Context

Despite these benefits, neurodivergent workers remain an underutilised resource in Australia. The prevailing approach often frames neurodiversity as an issue of compliance under the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA), focusing narrowly on the provision of “reasonable adjustments.” This view not only limits the potential contributions of neurodivergent workers but also fails to capture the broader advantages of neurodiversity awareness and neurodiversity training in the workplace. There are several problems with viewing neurodiversity employment solely through the lens of disability discrimination:
1. It assumes all neurodivergent workers have received a formal diagnosis, which is not always the case. Many individuals with ADHD, Autism, or Dyslexia may not be formally diagnosed and are therefore excluded from necessary support;

2. It presumes that neurodivergent workers identify as “disabled,” which many do not;

3. It assumes that those who are diagnosed and identify as disabled feel safe disclosing their condition and asking for adjustments. Many neurodivergent workers, fearing stigma or past experiences of unfair dismissal, may choose to remain silent about their needs.

For every neurodivergent worker who seeks help from their employer, many more remain silent and unsupported. While the medical model of disability and protections under the DDA and Anti-Discrimination Acts are necessary, they do not fully address the complexities of neurodiversity at work. There is a pressing need for employers to rethink their approach to accommodating and supporting neurodivergent talent through proactive neurodiversity training and awareness initiatives and a system-wide review of employment practices generally to ensure accessibility.

Legal and Compensation Implications

The growing focus on neurodiversity awareness is reflected in an increase in legal claims related to neurodiversity at work. In the UK, there has been a notable rise in employment tribunal claims related to neurodiversity discrimination, a trend that may soon be mirrored in Australia. As awareness of neurodivergent conditions grows, so does the likelihood of legal actions against employers who fail to provide adequate support or reasonable adjustments.

In Australia, the significance of the Truffet vs Workers’ Compensation Regulator [2019] case cannot be overlooked. This case established that the deterioration of a worker’s Autism satisfied the definition of a personal injury under the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act. Although the claim ultimately failed because the management action was deemed reasonable, the case set a precedent that could open the door to more successful claims in the future where employment conditions are deemed a significant contributing factor and/or the management action was unreasonable or unreasonably undertaken. Employers and insurers need to be on notice that as awareness increases, so too will the potential for both statutory workers’ compensation and common law damages claims related to neurodiversity.

Recent Fair Work Commission (FWC) cases in Australia involving neurodivergent workers illustrate the importance of clear medical evidence in supporting claims, the need for employers to make reasonable adjustments, and the complexities surrounding the interpretation of dismissal.

In the case of Andrew Duffy v. McHugh Steel [2024] FWC 362 substantial medical evidence related to ADHD and depression led the FWC to grant an extension of time for filing a claim. Conversely, in cases like Rhys John Oldridge v. Tom Stoddart Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 830 the absence of consistent evidence resulted in the dismissal of the application.

Employers must be proactive in supporting neurodivergent workers to avoid such disputes, ensuring that workplace practices align with neurodiversity awareness and inclusivity standards. The rise in unfair dismissal claims related to neurodiversity at work serves as a warning that many workplaces still struggle to accommodate the unique needs of neurodivergent employees effectively.

Lessons for Employers and Workers

For Employers

 1. Proactively implement neurodiversity awareness training programs to increase awareness and understanding of neurodivergent conditions like ADHD, Autism, and Dyslexia. This training should also cover the importance of making reasonable adjustments to support employees’ productivity and well-being.
2. In consultation with workers from diverse backgrounds, review employment practices and systems to ensure accessibility for all workers.

NDSW image of a computer, a ipad, and a laptop

3. Adopt a person-centered approach to supporting workers with different thinking and functioning abilities, rather than being driven by neurodivergent labels (ADHD, Autism, Dyslexia etc.) which can be misleading. Focus on the individual’s core strengths and abilities as well as identifying challenge areas where they need support. The Neurodiversity Workplace Profiler can help take some of the guesswork out of this.

4. Maintain thorough documentation of all employee interactions, especially regarding potential dismissals. Clear communication about employment status and any concerns regarding performance or behaviour is essential.
5. Address employee concerns promptly and ensure that any disciplinary actions are justified, documented, and communicated clearly.

By fostering an environment of openness, collaboration, inclusivity and support, employers can prevent issues from escalating to legal disputes.

 

For Workers

  1. Be aware of statutory deadlines for filing claims related to unfair dismissal or workers’ compensation and seek legal advice if delays are unavoidable. Understanding the importance of timely action is critical in protecting your rights. Ask a friend or relative to help you keep track of due dates and deadlines if you are overwhelmed by these.
  2. Document any workplace issues related to neurodiversity at work, such as challenges in receiving reasonable adjustments or managing work health and safety hazards that you may experience differently. Seek support both within and outside the workplace. This documentation can provide crucial evidence if a dispute arises.
  3. Familiarise yourself with legal definitions related to dismissal and resignation, particularly in the context of disability discrimination. Understanding these concepts can help in accurately assessing your situation and framing your claims effectively.

Where to get help

The Neurodiverse Safe Work Initiative is committed to guiding employers on this journey, offering the necessary neurodiversity training, coaching, and resources to build neuro-inclusive workplaces.

During August 2024 the Neurodiverse Safe Work Initiative provided neurodiversity awareness training to 58 people from 37 organisations across 3 states. Here’s what participant said:

Catherine knows her stuff and provides a safe, comfortable and engaging learning environment.

I took lots from the session that will enable our organisation to make positive changes and drive neurodiversity-affirming practices to create a safer and more inclusive environment for our staff. 

I liked the level of detail and accuracy of the information provided.

The presenter came from a lived experience coupled with their extensive health background and experience in WHS, Workers’ Compensation and employee/case relations.

The content was on point, well delivered and plenty of resources.

The content framework, the presenter’s style, the layering of information, and the scenarios used were all great.

The case studies helped me understand the relevant concepts.

The content was great and very informative. I liked the smaller learning environment. I wouldn’t want the attendee list to be any longer, as this group was a nice size to still have wider discussions and ask questions freely. 

Thank you, Cathy, for the work you are doing in this space. As a neurodivergent person myself, it brings me great joy to see this topic being spoken about more. It’s quite shocking that there is a lack of information on this topic, so it’s great to see how dedicated you are.

Extremely informative and well-paced training session on Neurodiversity in the workplace. It included easy-to-understand concepts, information, and examples, backed by research and a proactive approach to not only work health and safety and best practice case examples but also neurodiversity and supports in the workplace that were both relevant and practical that all organisations could use and implement.

The presenter was knowledgeable and interesting; the content was thorough yet easy to understand.

The content and structure of the workshop was very good.

I thoroughly enjoyed this workshop. It helped me better understand neurodiversity, and I felt engaged throughout the entire workshop.

If you’re interested in our upcoming public courses on Neurodiversity Awareness, please register your interest [here] or you can register for one of our online courses here.

To find out more about the Neurodiversity Workplace Profiler click [here].

Conclusion

Embracing neurodiversity at work is not just a legal and ethical obligation but a strategic advantage that can lead to significant business benefits. By recognising and harnessing the unique strengths of neurodivergent workers, businesses can address workforce shortages and create more inclusive, dynamic work environments.

 

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2019). Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: Summary of Findings.
Austin, R. D., & Pisano, G. P. (2017). Neurodiversity as a Competitive Advantage.
OECD. (2020). Employment rate of persons with disabilities.
Telstra. (2021). Diversity and Inclusion.
Truffet v Workers’ Compensation Regulator [2019] QIRC 201

Skip to content